Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics
Ethical guidelines and standards for all stakeholders in Journal of Innovation in Informatics (JII).
Jurnal Inovasi Informatik (JII) is committed to maintaining high standards of publication ethics in every published article. This policy refers to guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and covers the responsibilities of authors, editors, reviewers, and journal publishers.
BASED ON STANDARDS
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
1 AUTHOR ETHICS
Author Responsibilities
Authors are responsible for ensuring that submitted works to JII meet publication ethics standards with the following requirements:
Originality
Submitted manuscripts must be the result of original research and have never been published or are currently under review in other journals.
Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that manuscripts are free from plagiarism, with a maximum similarity threshold of:
20% (Turnitin or similar tools)
Authorship
All individuals who contribute significantly to the research must be listed as authors, while those providing only technical assistance or funding may be included in acknowledgments.
Data Transparency
Authors must provide valid and verifiable research data when requested by editors or reviewers.
Conflicts of Interest
Authors must disclose all forms of conflicts of interest that could influence research results.
Publication Corrections
If errors are found in published manuscripts, authors must immediately notify the journal editor for corrections or retraction if necessary.
2 EDITOR ETHICS
Editorial Responsibilities
Editors are responsible for maintaining publication integrity by applying the following principles:
Publication Decisions
Editors are responsible for determining which articles will be published based on review results and academic contributions.
Objectivity
Editors must evaluate manuscripts based on academic quality without bias regarding personal aspects, race, gender, religion, or authors' institutional affiliations.
Confidentiality
Editors are prohibited from disclosing manuscript information to parties other than authors, reviewers, and relevant editorial team members.
Conflicts of Interest
Editors should not be involved in editorial decisions for manuscripts where they have potential conflicts of interest.
3 REVIEWER ETHICS
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers play an important role in ensuring the quality and validity of published articles through the double-blind peer review process. Reviewers must comply with the following:
Confidentiality
All content of reviewed manuscripts is confidential and must not be shared or used for personal interests.
Objectivity
Reviewers must provide objective and scientifically-based assessments without personal bias toward authors.
References & Validity
Reviewers should point out relevant references that authors may have missed and identify potential plagiarism or publication duplication.
Conflicts of Interest
If reviewers feel they have conflicts of interest with reviewed articles, they must inform the editor and withdraw from the review process.
4 PUBLISHER ETHICS
Pradita University as Publisher
As the publisher of JII, Pradita University is responsible for supporting academic publication sustainability by upholding ethical standards as follows:
Academic Freedom
Ensuring academic freedom and scientific integrity in publications.
Transparent Peer Review
Providing support for fair and transparent peer review processes.
Decisive Action
Taking firm action against ethical violations, including article retraction if academic misconduct is found.
Open Access
Supporting open access policies to encourage widespread dissemination of knowledge.
Commitment to Scientific Integrity
By implementing these ethical guidelines, Journal of Innovation in Informatics strives to maintain publication quality and support scientific integrity within the academic community.
