Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Comprehensive peer review guidelines and procedures for Jurnal Inovasi Informatika (JII).
Every manuscript submitted to Jurnal Inovasi Informatika undergoes a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of scientific quality, methodological reliability, and theoretical soundness.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Assessment Standards
Every manuscript is assessed based on the following comprehensive criteria to ensure publication excellence:
1
Authenticity & Contribution
Originality and significant contribution to the field of scientific publishing and informatics research.
2
Methodological Reliability
Sound research methodology and theoretical framework appropriate to the research objectives.
3
Scope Alignment
Alignment with journal topics and relevance to the field of information technology and computer science.
4
Coherence & Analysis
Logical coherence in analysis, clear presentation of results, and comprehensive discussion.
5
Writing Quality
Proper grammar, clear writing style, and adherence to journal formatting guidelines and academic standards.
REVIEW METHODOLOGY
Double-Blind Peer Review
????
Anonymous Review Process
Each manuscript submitted by authors undergoes a double-blind peer review where both reviewer and author identities remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process.
2
Minimum Reviewers
Each article reviewed by minimum of two qualified reviewers
✓
Acceptance Criteria
Article accepted with recommendations from two reviewers and editor approval
+1
Conflict Resolution
Additional reviewer assigned when conflicting decisions arise
REVIEWER QUALIFICATIONS
Reviewer Selection Criteria
Minimum Requirements
The principle of reviewer recruitment requires candidates to have authored at least three scientific journal articles as either first author or co-author, published in both accredited national-scale and international-scale scientific journals.
✓
Publication Record
Demonstrated expertise through publication in accredited national and international journals
✓
Subject Matter Expertise
Specialized knowledge and experience in relevant fields of informatics and computer science
✓
Academic Standing
Active involvement in academic research and scholarly activities in their field
REVIEW WORKFLOW
Step-by-Step Process
1
Initial Editorial Screening
Section editor reviews incoming papers for scope alignment. If manuscript doesn't match journal scope or formatting requirements, it will be returned with feedback for revision or rejection.
2
Style and Format Check
If manuscript meets scope requirements, it undergoes style verification. Papers not conforming to JII formatting guidelines are returned to authors for corrections.
3
Reviewer Assignment
Papers meeting all requirements are assigned to qualified reviewers. Section editor selects minimum of two reviewers using double-blind methodology.
4
Decision Resolution
If conflicting decisions arise between reviewers, additional reviewers are assigned to provide final recommendation on article acceptance or rejection.
Questions About the Review Process?
Contact our editorial team for clarification on peer review procedures or timeline inquiries.
